Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Fenello et al v. Family First Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01139
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Fenello and Kathryn H. Fenello
Defendant:
Family First Mortgage, Inc., National City Mortgage, Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and others
Hayduk v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv01113
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Hayduk
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A. and MERS
Radomski v. Anchor Funding Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00753
Plaintiff:
John Radomski
Defendant:
Anchor Funding Corporation , U.S. Bank, N.A. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Barber v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 3:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Barber
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , America's Servicing Company and U.S. Bank, N.A.
James v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
Keith James
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and McCurdy & Candler, LL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ghraizi v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 1:2012cv02223
Plaintiff:
Gladys M. Ghraizi
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Joseph
as 1:2012cv01724
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Sean Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Hay v. Bank of America, National Association et al
as 1:2012cv01596
Plaintiff:
Naphtali (Billy) Hay
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Thomas v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv01239
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Lotallah v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2012cv01062
Plaintiff:
Iffath J. Lotallah
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association , Banc of America Funding Corp., Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2008-1, Banc of America Funding Trust 2008-1 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
