Other Statutes Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Dale Adams v. DHS, et al
as 20-1497
Petitioner: Dale B. Adams
Respondent: United States Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties
P.J.E.S. v. Peter Gaynor, et al
as 20-5357
Defendant / Appellant: Matthew T. Albence, Deputy Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Robert R. Redfield, Dr., Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in his official capacity, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: P.J.E.S., a minor child, by and through his father and next friend, Mario Escobar Francisco, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Amicus Curiae: Natalia Molina, Gerald L. Neuman, Julian Lim and others
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03204
Defendant: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2020cv03155
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff: HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC. and HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
as 1:2020cv03120
Plaintiff: NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD, PROJECT SOUTH and CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
AGUASVIVAS v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2020cv02822
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff: CRISTIAN AGUASVIVAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
I.A., et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-5271
Plaintiff / Appellee: M.X., by and through his mother, A.C., by and through his mother, Y.D. and others
Defendant / Appellant: Mark L. Morgan, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, United States Customs and Border Protection, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and others
FOUCHE v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2020cv02384
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Plaintiff: JEANDRE FOUCHE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Southern Poverty Law Center v. DHS, et al
as 20-5257
Defendant / Appellant: Nathalie Asher, Acting Assistant Director, Field Operations for Enforcement and Removal Operations, in official capacity, Matthew T. Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in official capacity, Claire Trickler-McNulty, Acting Director U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Office of Detention Policy and Planning, in official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Southern Poverty Law Center, in its individual capacity and on behalf of its clients detained at LaSalle ICE Processing Center, Irwin County Detention Center, and Stewart Detention Center
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv02153
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff: AMERICAN OVERSIGHT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?