Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Maldonado v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv00051
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Maldonado
Notice Only Party:
Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI, Social Security Liaison, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tillison v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00270
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Notice Only Party:
Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Liaison, U.S. Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Wayne Tillison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Renteria v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00232
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Notice Only Party:
Office of the General Counsel, Social Security Liaison, U.S. Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Blanca Isela Renteria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ontiveros v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00158
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Ontiveros
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Corpus v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00087
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Enrique Corpus
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison, U.S. Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Alva v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Maria Silvia Alva
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pinon v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00066
Defendant:
Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Salvador Pinon
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison, U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
