Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HICKS et al v. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2020cv15575
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA HICKS and STEPHEN HICKS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
BARKSDALE et al v. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv14412
Defendant:
Srbui Muradyan, One Realty d/b/a RE/MAX One Realty, Shannon Steeg and others
Plaintiff:
William Barksdale, Jr. and Trene Barksdale
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
LABOSSIERE et al v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2018cv12719
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MOMPEROUSSE and YVETTE LABOSSIERE
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE FOR BLUEWATER INVESTMENT TRUST 2017-1, SELENE FINANCE LP, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. ROSENBERG
as 2:2018mc00201
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
MAURY ROSENBERG
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. ROSENBERG
as 2:2018mc00200
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
MAURY ROSENBERG
KUBU v. EISENBERG et al
as 2:2018cv09124
Plaintiff:
JERRY THOMAS KUBU
Defendant:
STEVEN K EISENBERG , JACUELINE F MCNALLY , DAVID M LAMBROPOULOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv08953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
