Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 121 - 130 of 305
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35357
Defendant: ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant: WAPATO HERITAGE LLC and GARY REYES
Anniversary Mining Claims, LLC v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-15643
Defendant / Appellee: FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, LAKE MEAD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANNIVERSARY MINING CLAIMS, LLC
Robert Doucette, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 20-35269
Plaintiff / Appellant: SATURNINO JAVIER, TRESEA DOUCETTE, BERNADINE ROBERTS and others
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN TAHSUDA, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs, in his official capacity, TARA SWEENEY, Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs, in her official capacity, DAVID BERNHARDT, Acting Secretary for the United States Department of Interior, in his official capacity and others
State of California et al v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01563
Plaintiff: State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: Thomas B. Modly, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America and others
Amicus Curiae: U.S. House of Representatives
Petitioner: Stephen P. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Samuel Kent v. U.S. Office of the Inspector, et al
as 20-70391
Respondent: U.S. OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Petitioner: SAMUEL JAMES KENT
California State Lands Commission v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00892
Plaintiff: California State Lands Commission
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Department of Transportation, David Bernhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-15044
Defendant / Appellee: MARK T. ESPER, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Defense, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, RYAN D. MCCARTHY, senior official performing the duties of the Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff: STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF VERMONT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF COLORADO and others
Amicus Curiae: FORMER U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, EL PASO COUNTY, FORMER MEMBERS OF CONGRESS and others
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-17502
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae: ANDY BARR, U.S. Representative
Center for Bio. Diversity v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 19-36031
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and JAMES W. KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Center for Bio. Diversity v. David Bernhardt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35981
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and JAMES W. KURTH, in his official capacity as Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?