Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Roman v. Moro et al
as 1:2015cv01456
Plaintiff:
Enriqueta Roman and Daniel Moro
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Consulate General of the U.S., Juarez, Mexico and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Erwin v. U.S. Department of State
as 1:2011cv06513
Plaintiff:
John Erwin
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Rudolf et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
Germar Rudolf and Jennifer Rudolf
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State , Hilary Clinton , U.S. Consulate General Frankfurt and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06984
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ayesh v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2008cv00542
Plaintiff:
Hatem Ayesh
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Julie L. Myers, Michael B. Mukasey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fematt-Esparaza v. U.S. Department of State
as 1:2007cv01728
Plaintiff:
Mauro Armando Fematt-Esparaza and Mauro Armando Fematt-Esparaza
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State and U.S. Department of State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
