Cases 21 - 30 of 98
DENOYER v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Petitioner:
DALE ERNEST DENOYER
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00492
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SWEENEY v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2016cv00404
Plaintiff:
JOHN SWEENEY
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALLOY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Petitioner:
GERALD J. MALLOY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARNES v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv02160
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E. GARNES
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
RIOUS v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv01795
Petitioner:
WILLIAMS JAMES RIOUS
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BETHEA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2015cv01676
Plaintiff:
TERENCE K. BETHEA, TIMOTHY L. ROBINSON, DARNELL THOMAS and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIRTH v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01370
Plaintiff:
JAMES BIRTH
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, COURT SERVICES AND OFFENDER SUPERVISION AGENCY, APRIL OAKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2015cv00069
Petitioner:
WALTER BRADLEY
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
