Cases 81 - 90 of 98
PHILLIPS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOWARD v. CAUFIELD et al
as 1:2009cv00211
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEROY HOWARD
Defendant:
CAUFIELD and U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WATTS v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2009cv00156
Petitioner:
ANDRE SYLVESTER WATTS
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JACKSON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv01373
Petitioner:
AINSWORTH C. JACKSON
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, CSOSA and FEDERAL BUREAU OFPRISONS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MCFADDEN v. US PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2008cv01328
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS HEMPSTON MCFADDEN
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and A. FALLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORTON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2008cv00548
Petitioner:
GREGROY W. HORTON
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MARTIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00181
Petitioner:
BARRY B. MARTIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, CSOSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HAMMOND v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2008cv00147
Petitioner:
KENNETH N. HAMMOND
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACKSON v. D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv00026
Petitioner:
MERVIN JACKSON
Respondent:
D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D.C. PAROLE BOARD, U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WILSON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv01522
Petitioner:
THOMAS WILSON
Respondent:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION and JOHN CAULFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
