Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Marcuso v. U.S. Judge et al
as 1:2023cv21885
Plaintiff:
Taite Marcuso
Defendant:
U.S. Judge, Insurance Providers Trusts, Bonds With U.S. Secretary of State Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ricardo Martinelli Berrocal v. Attorney General of the United States, et al
as 23-10833
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO ALBERTO MARTINELLI BERROCAL
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE and THOMAS B HEINEMANN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Alexander Horvath v. U.S. Secretary of State, et al
as 22-13517
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALEXANDER HORVATH
Respondent / Appellee:
U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, MICHAEL S. YEAGER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
