Cases 11 - 20 of 68
COBURN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2021cv02991
Plaintiff:
GORDON J COBURN and GORDON J. COBURN
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 1:2021cv02842
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SPECTOR-NARANJO v. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 1:2020cv02732
Plaintiff:
CHIARA SPECTOR-NARANJO
Defendant:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv01760
Defendant:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MCKILLOP
as 1:2019cv00852
Defendant:
JAMES K. MCKILLOP
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MCKILLOP
as 1:2019mc00043
Defendant:
JAMES K. MCKILLOP
Plaintiff:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
AGARWAL et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv03125
Defendant:
MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, JACQUELINE L. RUSSELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
ANIL AGARWAL, MADHU AGARWAL and RISHI RAKSHPAL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
HUNTER MATHIS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv02702
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER MATHIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. WAYMACK
as 1:2018mc00128
Respondent:
JOHN PAUL WAYMACK
Petitioner:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WAYMACK v. U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
as 1:2018mc00110
Respondent:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Petitioner:
PAUL WAYMACK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
