Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Romelus v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of Florida, Inc.
as 1:2012cv23852
Plaintiff:
Omelise Romelus
Defendant:
Brandsmart U.S.A. of Florida, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Kapes v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Harry Kapes
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stewart v. U.S.A. Auto Care, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv60262
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stewart
Defendant:
U.S.A. Auto Care, Inc. and Nour Albandakji
Mediator:
Neil Flaxman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Miller v. Strong Arm Productions, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv20335
Plaintiff:
Mahogany Miller
Defendant:
Strong Arm Productions, U.S.A., Inc. and Tramar Dillard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Allemani v. Pratt Industries (U.S.A.), Inc.
as 1:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dennis Allemani
Defendant:
Pratt Industries (U.S.A.), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Romero v. BrandsMart, U.S.A., Inc
as 1:2011cv24185
Defendant:
BrandsMart, U.S.A., Inc and Brandsmart USA Dadeland, LLC
Plaintiff:
Orlando Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez et al v. Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
as 6:2011cv01219
Plaintiff:
Jimmy A. Rodriguez and Karla Anticona
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Patterson v. U.S.A. Broadband Wireless Corp.
as 0:2010cv62123
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Patterson
Defendant:
U.S.A. Broadband Wireless Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Dunn et al v. Brandsmart U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03469
Plaintiff:
Gilbert R. Dunn, Jr. and Curtis Kaufman
Defendant:
Brandsmart U.S.A., Inc., Brandsmart U.S.A. of Clayton County, LLC, Brandsmart U.S.A. of Doraville, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cleare v. Caribe Inflatables, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv23355
Defendant:
Caribe Inflatables, U.S.A., Inc. and Domenico Fossati
Plaintiff:
Ethon Cleare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
