Cases 1 - 6 of 6
U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02054
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc., Kelly Gray, Kim Lawrie and others
Plaintiff:
U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
NOT USED
as 2:2016cv01693
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc. and Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. et al v. Crocs, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01694
Defendant:
Crocs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Double Diamond Distribution, Ltd. and U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Toyo Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd. et al v. Kabusikiki Kaisha Tokyo Nihoon Rubber Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv01847
Defendant:
Japan Toyomoto Tire Corp., Kabusikiki Kaisha Tokyo Nihoon Rubber Corp., Toyomoto (Beijing) International Trading Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas Inc., Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. and Toyo Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Toyo Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd. et al v. Toyama Tyre Corp., Ltd. et al
as 2:2013cv02062
Defendant:
Hong Kong Toyama Tyre Int'l Ltd., Toyama Tyre Corp., Ltd. and Toyama Tyre Corp., Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Toyo Tire Holdings of Americas Inc., Toyo Tire U.S.A. Corp. and Toyo Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Kaufman et al
as 2:2007cv00879
Plaintiff:
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. and others
Defendant:
Albert M. Kaufman, Replica Lovers, RLCV.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
