Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Jacobs v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2016cv02689
Plaintiff:
Delanzo Jacobs
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hale v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2016cv01685
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holloway v. Home Depot et al
as 1:2016cv01571
Plaintiff:
Michael Holloway
Defendant:
Home Depot , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. , John Doe Individuals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rinaldo v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2016cv01337
Plaintiff:
Patrick Rinaldo
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abney et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00410
Plaintiff:
Danny Abney , Janice Abney and Bureau of Workers' Compensation State of Ohio
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hallenstein v. Home Depot et al
as 1:2015cv00551
Plaintiff:
Raymond Hallenstein
Defendant:
The Home Depot and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doll et al v. Home Depot, Inc., The et al
as 1:2014cv02848
Plaintiff:
Neil E Doll and Beulah Doll
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc., The , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and HD Development of Maryland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 5:2013cv02840
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Armstrong and James Armstrong
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Headley et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01839
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc , Home Depot Store Support LLC , John Doe No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joellen Headley and Ronnie Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. MAT Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01834
Plaintiff:
James K Bryant
Defendant:
MAT Holdings, Inc. , Home Depot U.S.A., Inc , Home Depot Store 3803 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
