Cases 31 - 40 of 85
Hamilton v. Behr Process Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01765
Plaintiff:
Michael Hamilton
Defendant:
Behr Process Corporation, Behr Paint Corporation, Masco Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Janice Huskey v. Behr Process Corp. et al
as 8:2017cv01374
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc., Behr Paint Corp., Masco Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Janice Huskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55892
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
JAMES STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
CEMIL HOPE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Brian Warner, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In
as 17-55891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRIAN WARNER, KENNETH MACLEOD, MICHAEL MEADE and others
Objector - Appellant:
GAY HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., a California corporation
Matin Shalikar v. Asahi Beer U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv02713
Defendant:
Asahi Beer U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Panvini and Matin Shalikar
Craya C. Caron v. Fletcher Jones Motors Cars Inc et al
as 8:2017cv00565
Plaintiff:
Craya C. Caron
Defendant:
Does, Fletcher Jones Motors Cars Inc and Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., LLC
Oscar Herrera v. LG Electronics USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01039
Defendant:
Does, LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Oscar Herrera
Sandy Hafer v. Nestle U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
Sandy Hafer
Defendant:
Nestle U.S.A., Inc.
Mohammad Daboussi v. Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08049
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Daboussi
Defendant:
Does and Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
