Cases 11 - 20 of 30
BROCK v. BEHR PROCESS CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv12341
Plaintiff:
BARRY BROCK
Defendant:
BEHR PROCESS CORP., BEHR PAINT CORP., MASCO CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FEINBERG et al v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2017cv06931
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FEINBERG , JOHN MCBRIDE , SYLVESTER SCARBOROUGH and others
Defendant:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ et al v. QUINTERO et al
as 2:2015cv07949
Plaintiff:
JAY RODRIGUEZ, THE ACCESS NEWSPAPER CORP, THE IMPACTO NEWSPAPER CORP and others
Defendant:
JOHN QUINTERO, CATHERINE A. MUNOZ, VANESSA MANCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOTI v. TOYOTA MOTORS SALES, U.S.A., INC.
as 1:2015cv06625
Plaintiff:
REGINA M FOTI
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTORS SALES, U.S.A., INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KEISTER et al v. TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2014cv05459
Plaintiff:
LEKHA KEISTER
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIEBLER v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC., a Delaware corporation
as 2:2014cv03500
Plaintiff:
DAVID LIEBLER
Defendant:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hawkins v. Gerber Products Company
as 2:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
Shavonda Hawkins
Defendant:
GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY and NESTLE U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Burns v. Gerber Products Company et al
as 2:2013cv00882
Plaintiff:
Ryan Burns
Defendant:
GERBER PRODUCTS COMPANY and NESTLE U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rawson v. L'Oreal USA Inc.
as 2:2013cv00440
Plaintiff:
Mary Rawson
Defendant:
L'OREAL U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Justin Gordon and MELISSA KING
Defendant:
L'OREAL U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
