Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Rivera v. U.S.A.
as 1:2011cv00969
Petitioner:
John Rivera
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Willis v. U.S.A.
as 1:2011cv00909
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Petitioner:
Dexter Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Adelanwu v. U.S.A.
as 1:2011cv00869
Petitioner:
Damola Adelanwu
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Razzoli et al v. Executive Office of US Marshals et al
as 1:2010cv05962
Plaintiff:
Kevin Razzoli, Known & Unknown Catholics, Raz Trading LLC of NY & Phila, PA and others
Defendant:
Executive Office of US Marshals, Executive Office Of F.B.I., Executive Office of N.Y. State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00093
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02992
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cambrelen v. U.S.A.
as 1:2009cv02566
Petitioner:
Ryan Cambrelen
Respondent:
U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Elfgeeh vs USA
as 1:2009cv02015
Petitioner:
Abad Elfgeeh
Respondent:
U.S.A. and U.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kendall v. Sweeney et al
as 1:2007cv05879
Petitioner:
Cyril Kendall
Respondent:
Allan Sweeney, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
