Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Uber Technologies, Inc. et al v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400432 et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400432 doing business as Principia Underwriters and CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. B0146CYUSA1400588 doing business as Aspen Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Nuggets and Carats, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds, London et al
as 8:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Nuggets & Carats, Inc. and Nuggets and Carats, Inc.
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Syndicate No. 3624 Subscribing to Policy No. MPL4029619.21, Hiscox, Inc. d/b/a Hiscox Insurance Agency in California, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Monarch Title Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate No. SUANESB10204-2103 et al
as 2:2023cv10867
Plaintiff:
MONARCH TITLE COMPANY
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. SUANESB10204-2103, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. SUA6191-2203, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Certificate No. SUANESB10204 2103 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Columbia Casualty Company et al
as 3:2023cv02157
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Defendant:
Columbia Casualty Company and Admiral Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Spokeo, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. CT1006920
as 2:2023cv09260
Plaintiff:
Spokeo, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Spokeo, Inc.
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy. No. CT1006920, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London Subscribing to Policy No. CT1006920 and Does 1 to 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Amyn, Inc. v. StarStone Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv07924
Plaintiff:
Amyn, Inc. dba Jewelry on 7th and Amyn, Inc. doing business as Jewelry on 7th
Defendant:
StarStone Specialty Insurance Company, Does 1 through 30, inclusive and Certain Underwriters At Lloyds, London Subscribing To Policy No. Ss0002319/0010.o
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Security National Ins. Co. v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Security National Insurance Company
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company, Ironshore Indemnity, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Patagonia Food Group, LLC v. CFC Underwriting Ltd.
as 2:2023cv05749
Plaintiff:
Patagonia Food Group, LLC
Defendant:
CFC Underwriting Ltd., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London and Certain London Market Insurance Companies as Subscribing Policy No. CML0039566689
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, subscribing to Policy No. SUA WS20214-1801 v. VoIP Guardian LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03710
Plaintiff:
Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, subscribing to Policy No. SUA WS20214-1801 and Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, subscribing to Policy No. SUA WS20214-1801
Defendant:
VoIP Guardian LLC, VOIP GUARDIAN PARTNERS I, LLC, Rodney Omanoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Subscribing to Policy No. 311227619AA v. DFM Trucking LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Subscribing to Policy No. 311227619AA
Defendant:
DFM Trucking LLC and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
