Cases 71 - 80 of 265
GILLMANN v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67769
Plaintiff:
ELSIE R. GILLMANN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIPPEL v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67842
Plaintiff:
GERALD E SIPPEL
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOHLS v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67893
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS H. KOHLS
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREDFICK v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67783
Plaintiff:
HARLAND A FREDFICK, SR
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZUNKER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67894
Plaintiff:
EMIL H ZUNKER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARTA
as 2:2010cv67771
Plaintiff:
JOHN J BARTA
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. KEMPEN et al
as 2:2010cv67803
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KEMPEN
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERICKSON v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67813
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ERICKSON
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELZER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67887
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K MELZER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FIDELER v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2010cv67890
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FIDELER
Defendant:
ACANDS INC , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP, AP GREEN REFRACTORIES CO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
