Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Local Union No 1506 v. A and B Construction, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv01151
Respondent: AandB Construction, Inc.
Petitioner: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Local Union No 1506
K&M Installation, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv05265
Plaintiff: K&M Installation, Inc.
Defendant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters, Local 405 and Carpenters 46 Northern California Conference Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Harris v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv02589
Defendant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
Plaintiff: John H. Harris
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Graff Diamonds (San Francisco) Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America Local 22
as 3:2014cv00763
Plaintiff: Graff Diamonds (San Francisco) Inc.
Defendant: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 22
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Michael Casas et al v. Carpenters Union Local #209 et al
as 8:2013cv01968
Movant: Virginia Augustine and Jimenez Theodore
Plaintiff: Virginia Augustine, Michael Casas, Theodore Jimenez and others
Real Party In Interest Plaintiff: Lynda Bui
Defendant: Carpenters Union Local #209, Does, Silverline Construction, Inc and others
Michael McCarron et al v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al
as 8:2013cv01559
Defendant: Douglas Banes, Michael V Draper, Douglas J McCarron and others
Plaintiff: Lindsey Maldoon, Michael McCarron and Michael Olds
Type: Labor Labor: Other
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al v. Plasterers Union Local 200 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv10069
Defendant: Building and Construction Trades Department AFL-CIO, Plan for Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes in the Contruction Industry and Plasterers Union Local 200
Plaintiff: Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters and United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America
The Retail Property Trust v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2010cv01605
Defendant: Carpenters Local Union No 803, DOES, James Flores and others
Plaintiff: The Retail Property Trust
United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America et al v. United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 78 et al
as 2:2008cv06727
Plaintiff: United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters and others
Defendant: United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 78, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States of Canada AFL-CIO and Plan for the Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes in the Construction Industry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Raymond Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Plasterers Local No. 200, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, AFL-CIO et al
as 2:2008cv06445
Plaintiff: Raymond Interior Systems, Inc., United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America and others
Defendant: Plasterers Local No. 200, Operative Plasterers' and Cement Masons' International Association, AFL-CIO, Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association of the United States & Canada, AFL-CIO and Plan for the Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes in the Construction Industry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?