Cases 31 - 37 of 37
State of Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2009cv00821
Plaintiff:
State of Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, John McHugh, Jo-Ellen Darcy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2009cv02373
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
CTC Phase II LLC v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2009cv00153
Plaintiff:
CTC Phase II LLC
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers and Thomas J. Tickner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MORI PROPERTIES, INC. v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NEW YORK DISTRICT
as 2:2009cv00787
Plaintiff:
MORI PROPERTIES, INC. and MORI PROPERTIES, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS NEW YORK DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
as 3:2008cv05425
Plaintiff:
SURFRIDER FOUNDATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2008cv01917
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AMIRIANTZ, et al v. CRAWFORD, et al
as 1:2000cv00494
Plaintiff:
V. GEORGE AMIRIANTZ
Defendant:
JAMES A. CRAWFORD, JAMES W. WEINSTEIN, STEVE A. WYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
