Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Electric Clouds v. FDA
as 21-9577
Petitioner:
ELECTRIC CLOUDS, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cloud 9 Vapor Products v. FDA
as 21-9578
Petitioner:
CLOUD 9 VAPOR PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Goico v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 6:2020cv01248
Defendant:
Dr. Stephen M. Hahn and United States Food and Drug Administration
Plaintiff:
Peter Mario Goico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Cody Laboratories, Inc., et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 11-8001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CODY LABORATORIES, INC., a Wyoming corporation and LANNETT, CO, INC., a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as United States Department of Health and Human Services Secretary and MARGARET A. HAMBURG, in her official capacity as United States Food And Drug Administration Commissioner
Cody Laboratories Inc et al v. U S Department of Heath and Human Services Secretary et al
as 2:2010cv00147
Plaintiff:
Cody Laboratories Inc and Lannett Co Inc
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services Secretary and United States Food and Drug Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Regenerative Sciences, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug, et al
as 10-1125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGENERATIVE SCIENCES, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, FRANK TORTI, M.D., in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the United States Food and Drug Association, MARY A. MALARKEY, in her official capacity as Director of the Office of Compliance and Biologics Quality Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research and others
Regenerative Sciences, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Administration et al
as 1:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
Regenerative Sciences, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Frank Torti, Mary A. Malarkey and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
