Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Jones v. United States Marshals Service, et al
as 20-3197
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, in its official capacity, SARAH W. HAYS, Magistrate Judge, Western District of Missouri, 8th Circuit, in her individual and official capacity, RONALD BAKER, Warden, CoreCivic Leavenworth Detention Center, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONZELL A. JONES
Holz v. United States Marshal Service
as 19-6136
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Redmond v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2014cv02307
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons , United States Marshals Service , United States District Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Lepoleon Redmond, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
World Publishing Company v. United States Dept. of Justice
as 11-5063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WORLD PUBLISHING COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and its subordinate bureau, United States Marshals Service
Wright v. United States Marshals Service
as 2:2010cv02365
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wright
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
World Publishing Company v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2009cv00574
Plaintiff:
World Publishing Company
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
