Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Florentino v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00514
Petitioner: Bautista Sanchez Florentino and Florentino Bautista-Sanchez
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Alberty v. Rankins
as 4:2023cv00312
Petitioner: Farron Whitney Alberty
Respondent: United States of America, William Rankins and Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buck v. Rhoades et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00295
Plaintiff: Sheila Buck
Defendant: C.J. Rhoades, M.C. Parker, City of Tulsa, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelso v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00041
Plaintiff: John Donald Kelso
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rushing v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00022
Plaintiff: Timothy Lamar Rushing
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McGill v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00506
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Tracy Joevaun McGill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Maynard v. United States of America, The
as 4:2017cv00115
Plaintiff: John Charles Maynard
Defendant: United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00713
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Dan Williams
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maynard v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2016cv00531
Plaintiff: John Charles Maynard
Defendant: State of Oklahoma and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaton v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00518
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Jason Ryan Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?