Cases 51 - 60 of 90
United States of America v. Development Capital Ventures, L.P.
as 1:2010mc00054
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Development Capital Ventures, L.P.
United States of America v. Trident Growth Fund, L.P.
as 1:2010mc00055
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Trident Growth Fund, L.P.
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00019
Plaintiff:
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. and Rifu Apparel Corporation
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
In Re: Receivership of GKM SBIC, L.P.
as 1:2010mc00053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
GKM SBIC, L.P.
American Pacific Textile, Inc. et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00018
Plaintiff:
American Pacific Textile, Inc. , Grace International, Inc. , Handsome Textile Saipan Corporation and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
In Re: Receivership of Smart Forest Ventures I., L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership
as 1:2010mc00013
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Smart Forest Ventures I, L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership
Zheng v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00005
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ming Yan Zheng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States of America v. Crossbow Venture Partners LP
as 1:2010mc00001
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Crossbow Venture Partners LP
United States of America vs. Fundex Capital Corporation
as 1:2009mc00153
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Fundex Capital Corp.
Chen v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00044
Petitioner:
Guang Jing Chen
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
