Cases 1 - 10 of 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
JONES v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Petitioner:
THOMAS R. JONES
Defendant:
PAROLE COMMISSION
Respondent:
JONES MICHELE and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Calvin Wedington v. USA, et al
as 21-5235
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Calvin Scott Wedington
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and United States Parole Commission
Tony Weems v. Patricia Cushwa, et al
as 21-5189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony Weems
Defendant / Appellee:
Patricia Cushwa, Commissioner of the United States Parole Commission, Patricia Wilson-Smoot, Commissioner of the United Parole Commission, Charles Massarone, Commissioner of the United Parole Commission and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01560
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Artie Dufur v. USPC
as 21-5089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Artie Dufur
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Parole Commission
ARRINGTON v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
as 1:2021cv00261
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Plaintiff:
DERREK E. ARRINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2020cv03761
Plaintiff:
JOHN NEWMAN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
