Cases 1 - 10 of 20
JAMES v. B.O.P et al.
as 1:2022cv02806
Plaintiff:
CALVIN JAMES
Defendant:
B.O.P., US ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUAGLIN v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2022cv01154
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH QUAGLIN
Respondent:
US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, Superintendent NNRJ TED HULL, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOLIN v. US ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Defendant:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-5079
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SAUNDERS et al v. FLOWERS-CONTI et al
as 1:2014cv00870
Plaintiff:
HENRY SAUNDERS, ALBERT RANIERI, JAMES WHITTED and others
Defendant:
JOY FLOWERS-CONTI, KEITH A. PESTO and W.D. PENNSYLVANIA ASSISTANT US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORBEY v. WARDEN, DC JAIL et al
as 1:2014cv00196
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent:
Lane and US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Timothy Guess v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-5047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Wayne Guess
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01623
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Timothy Parrack v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-5249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy J. Parrack
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General
HUDSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv01193
Petitioner:
LEE O. HUDSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , US ATTORNEY GENERAL and GREGORY JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
