Cases
Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. STB, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1019
Petitioner: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Respondent: Surface Transportation Board and United States of America
Movant-Intervenor: US Magnesium LLC
US Magnesium LLC v. EPA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1269
Petitioner: US Magnesium LLC
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
All Plaintiffs, et al v. BNSF Railway Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7023
Plaintiff - Appellee: Dakota Granite Company, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, McIntyre Group, Ltd., GVL Pipe & Demolition, Inc., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: Fayus Enterprises, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Agway Liquidating Trust, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and Maroon Incorporated, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: BNSF Railway Company, CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Company and others
Appellee: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - MDL No. 1869
US MAGNESIUM LLC v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv02116
Plaintiff: US MAGNESIUM LLC
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation
MAGNOLA METALLURGY V US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-1099
Plaintiff-Appellant: Magnola Metallurgy, Inc.
Defendant-Appellee: US Magnesium LLC and United States
CANADIAN LUMBER TRADE V US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1622
Defendant-Appellant: AK Steel Corporation, Allegheny Ludlum Corporation, Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports Executive Committee and others
Allegheny Ludlum Corporation:
Plaintiff-Appellee: Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance, Canadian Wheat Board, Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant: Government of Canada
Government Of Canada:
Amicus Curiae: Government of Mexico, Mexinox USA, Inc. and ThyssenKrupp Mexinox S.A. de C.V.
In re: Coaltn Fair Lumber v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-1366
Petitioner: Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports, Executive Committee
Respondent: United States of America, George W. Bush, President, United States Department of Commerce and others
Intervenor: Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance, Inc., Ontario Forest Indust Assn, Ontario Lumber Manufacturers Assn and others
Intervenor For Respondent: Government of Canada
Amicus Curiae For Respondent: Canadian American Business Council and Government of Mexico
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner: Lindsey Graham, United States Senator, Susan Collins, United States Senator, Larry Craig, United States Senator and others
Terminated Party: Southern Tier Cement Committee and US Magnesium, LLC
In re: Coaltn Fair Lumber v. USA, et al
as 05-1366
Petitioner: Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports, Executive Committee
Respondent: United States of America, George W. Bush, President, United States Department of Commerce and others
Intervenor: Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance, Inc., Government of Canada, Ontario Forest Indust Assn and others
Amicus Curiae: Canadian American Business Council, Government of Mexico, Lindsey Graham, United States Senator and others
Not Yet Classified: Southern Tier Cement Committee and US Magnesium, LLC
BRATSK ALUMINIUM SMELTER V US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-1213
Amicus Curiae: American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade, Association of American School Paper Suppliers, et al., GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORP. and others
Defendant-Appellee: GLOBE METALLURGICAL INC., SIMCALA, INC. and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff-Appellant: SUAL HOLDING and ZAO KREMNY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?