Cases 71 - 80 of 1,152
Parks v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2022cv00465
Petitioner:
Darrell James Parks
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oscar v. FCC Coleman - USP II et al
as 5:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Oscar
Defendant:
FCC Coleman - USP II, W. White, R. Stephens-Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
OSCAR v. FCC COLEMAN USP 2
as 1:2022cv00228
Petitioner:
JEAN E OSCAR
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN USP 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oscar v. FCC Coleman USP II
as 5:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
Jean E. Oscar
Defendant:
FCC Coleman USP 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Knutson v. Warden, USP Coleman 2
as 5:2022cv00403
Petitioner:
Robin L. Knutson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sykes v. Warden, USP Coleman 2
as 5:2022cv00392
Petitioner:
Dorian Trevor Sykes
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
OSCAR v. FCC COLEMAN USP 2
as 1:2022cv00205
Petitioner:
JEAN OSCAR
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN USP 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores et al
as 5:2022cv00329
Petitioner:
Jose Humberto Flores
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James v. Sperry et al
as 5:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
FNU Sperry, FNU Stevens and Coleman USP-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Farrington v. Warden, USP Coleman I
as 6:2022cv01196
Petitioner:
Tavares L. Farrington
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
