Antitrust Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-521
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant: DoorDash Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats and Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae: United States Chamber of Commerce
Davitashvili v. Grubhub Inc.
as 23-522
Plaintiff / Appellee: Mariam Davitashvili, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Adam Bensimon, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Mia Sapienza and others
Defendant: DoorDash Inc., Postmates Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc., in its own right and as parent of wholly owned subsidiary Uber Eats
Defendant / Appellant: Grubhub Inc., DBA Seamless
Amicus Curiae: United States Chamber of Commerce
Eliades et al v. Grubhub Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05134
Defendant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc. and Grubhub Inc.
Plaintiff: John Boisi, Jonathan Swaby, Nathan Obey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Davitashvili et al v. Grubhub Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03000
Defendant: Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., DoorDash Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Mia Sapienza, Adam Bensimon and Mariam Davitashvili
Consolidated Plaintiff: Philip Eliades, Jonathan Swaby, John Boisi and others
Not Classified By Court: Cheeseboat Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2752
Plaintiff: Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Counter Claimant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Ergo
Defendant / Appellant: Travis Kalanick
Amicus Curiae: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Internet Association, Consumer Technology Association and others
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2750
Plaintiff: Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Counter Claimant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Ergo
Defendant / Appellant: Travis Kalanick
Amicus Curiae: The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Internet Association, Consumer Technology Association and others
Meyer v. Kalanick
as 16-2752
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Third-Party-Defendant: Ergo
Defendant - Appellant: Travis Kalanick
Meyer v. Kalanick We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2750
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee: Spencer Meyer, Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Third-Party-Defendant: Ergo
Defendant - Appellant: Travis Kalanick

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?