Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ayles v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00327
Plaintiff:
Kayanna Ayles
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
V.R. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
V.R.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pritschau v. Schultz et al
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Tyler Pritschau
Defendant:
Wade Schultz, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, Uber Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
v. Pritschau et al
as 1:2022oe00302
Defendant:
Tyler Pritschau, Wade Schultz, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
v. Pritschau et al
as 1:2022cv00302
Defendant:
Tyler Pritschau, Wade Schultz, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Thompson v. Nona et al
as 1:2020oe01016
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Medicaid, Uber Technologies, Inc. and William Nona
Plaintiff:
Brittany Thompson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Thompson v. Nona et al
as 1:2020cv01017
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Medicaid, Uber Technologies, Inc. and William Nona
Plaintiff:
Brittany Thompson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Thompson v. Nona et al
as 1:2020cv01016
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Medicaid, Uber Technologies, Inc. and William Nona
Plaintiff:
Brittany Thompson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Hight v. nicholas et al
as 1:2020cv00773
Defendant:
arlana nicholas, Uber Technologies, Inc., Thomas W Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Alexus Hight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scaccia v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00418
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Plaintiff:
John J. Scaccia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
