Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Adamson v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 4:2021cv00047
Plaintiff:
Richard Adamson
Defendant:
Kelly D Smith, Union Pacific Railroad and Lloyd Plymale
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Graves v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 4:2021cv00046
Plaintiff:
Billy Jack Graves
Defendant:
Kelly D Smith, Union Pacific Railroad and Lloyd Plymale
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Adamson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2018cv00432
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Lloyd Plymale
Plaintiff:
Billy Graves and Richard Adamson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Martinez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
Calvin Martinez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hobbs v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2013cv00571
Plaintiff:
Jerry R. Hobbs
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bomberger v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 6:2012cv01391
Plaintiff:
Gregory Bomberger
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Newman v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2012cv02518
Plaintiff:
Carl A. Newman, II
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company , Denis E. Corcoran and Kevin W. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Pfeifer v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2012cv02485
Plaintiff:
Nick Pfeifer
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Jessel v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
Roger Jessel
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2011cv00120
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
