Cases 31 - 39 of 39
USA v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA et al v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 2:2009cv00069
Plaintiff:
USA, State of Utah and State of Utah
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2008cv00903
Plaintiff:
USA and USA
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Utah Railway Company and MotivePower
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Chatwin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2008cv00893
Plaintiff:
Jerald H. Chatwin
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crandall et al v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 2:2008cv00450
Plaintiff:
Ben P. Crandall, Ben P. Crandall, Melinda Crandall and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Kip S. Smith and Kip S. Smith
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Renzenberger and George L. VanHorn
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0051 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Railco
as 2:2007cv00967
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
Railco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Carrington v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 2:2007cv00859
Plaintiff:
Shane Carl Carrington and Shane Carl Carrington
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad, Brown's Crew Car of Wyoming, Inc. and Robert Stephens
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 0051 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Nelson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2007cv00265
Plaintiff:
Ellen Nelson and Clyde Nelson
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
