Cases 1 - 10 of 24
CUIC, LLC v. NLRB
as 22-1005
Petitioner:
CUIC, LLC (Chicago Marriott at Medical District/UIC)
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor:
Unite Here Local 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DH Long Point Management LLC v. NLRB
as 20-1030
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Petitioner:
DH Long Point Management LLC
Intervenor:
Unite Here Local 11
Davidson Hotel Company, LLC v. NLRB
as 19-1235
Petitioner:
Davidson Hotel Company, LLC, (Chicago Marriot at Medical District/UIC) and Davidson Hotel Company, LLC, (Chicago Marriott at Medical District/UIC)
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor:
Unite Here Local 1
Cesar Parada Torres v. Unite Here Local 25
as 19-7035
Defendant / Appellee:
Unite Here Local 25
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cesar Parada Torres
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Grill Concepts Services, Inc. v. NLRB
as 17-1100
Petitioner:
Grill Concepts Services, Inc., d/b/a The Daily Grill
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Intervenor For Respondent:
Unite Here Local 11
Grill Concepts Services, Inc. v. NLRB
as 16-1238
Petitioner:
Grill Concepts Services, Inc., d/b/a The Daily Grill
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Unite Here Local 11
UNITE HERE LOCAL 23 v. IL CREATIONS OF MARYLAND INC.
as 1:2015cv01165
Plaintiff:
UNITE HERE LOCAL 23
Defendant:
IL CREATIONS OF MARYLAND INC.
Counter_claimant:
IL CREATIONS OF MARYLAND INC.
Counter_defendant:
UNITE HERE LOCAL 23
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Fortuna Enterprises, LP v. NLRB
as 14-1099
Petitioner:
Fortuna Enterprises, LP
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Unite Here Local 11
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
