Cases 1 - 10 of 52
IDI v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05771
Plaintiff:
ELIYAHU IDI
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JANE DOE, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ZEMEL v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv04034
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ZEMEL
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
ROJAS v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2024cv03765
Plaintiff:
CURTIS DAVID ROJAS
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2023cv23025
Plaintiff:
JOEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
VAFAEI-MAKHSOOS et al v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv20442
Plaintiff:
SHILDA VAFAEI-MAKHSOOS and ANDREW RUONA
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
NATARAJAN v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC
as 2:2023cv03402
Plaintiff:
BRENDA NATARAJAN
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AGRAWAL v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2023cv02855
Plaintiff:
MUKESH AGRAWAL
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AMALIA MAGANA PRADO v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
AMALIA MAGANA PRADO
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC., PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ, JOHN DOE #1-10 (fictitious) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
ZUCKER v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC et al
as 2:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL ZUCKER
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC, UNITED GROUND EXPRESS, INC. and JOHN DOE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED AIRLINES, INC.
as 2:2022cv07374
Plaintiff:
HENRY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC. and ABC COMPANIES INC. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
