Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Baker v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS)
as 23-4364
Plaintiff / Appellant: JUSTIN BAKER
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (UPS)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55814
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15448
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35505
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Warren Smith v. UPS, et al
as 22-15608
Plaintiff / Appellee: WARREN SMITH
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
UPS v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70061
Not Classified By Court: In re: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. and SHANE KISMAN
Petitioner: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., (Ohio)
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Jeremiah Balik v. City of Las Vegas, et al
as 21-16889
Plaintiff / Appellant: JEREMIAH WILLIAM BALIK
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF LAS VEGAS, CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL and others
Holly Perez v. UPS
as 21-16538
Plaintiff / Appellant: HOLLY PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Tyrone Doutherd v. UPS, et al
as 21-15966
Defendant: ESTATE OF LUCILLE J. SMITH, DORIS MARIE MONTESDEOCA and HARMONY HOME CARE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant: TYRONE DOUTHERD
Defendant / Appellee: LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Rattler Holdings, LLC v. UPS, et al
as 21-35014
Plaintiff / Appellant: RATTLER HOLDINGS, LLC, DBA Planetary Design
Defendant / Appellee: UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC. and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?