Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Walsh, et al. v. Northern Stone Supply, Inc. et al.
as 4:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Martin J. Walsh and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Northern Stone Supply, Inc. and Gregory L. Osterhout
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Hiroto v. United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Masao Hiroto
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Elizabeth Snow and Clara Sutherland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
United States of America v. Bowmans, Inc. of Mountain Home
as 1:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Bowmans, Inc. of Mountain Home
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Perez et al v. Clearwater Paper Corporation
as 3:2013cv00461
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Clearwater Paper Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Clay et al v. Radford
as 1:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Rod Clay, Rod Clay, Michael Breed and others
Defendant:
Jeff Radford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Bettwieser v. NLRB- Region 27 et al
as 1:2008cv00078
Plaintiff:
Martin Bettwieser
Defendant:
NLRB- Region 27, United States Postal Service, Martin Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO v. CH2M-WG, IDAHO LLC
as 1:2007cv00295
Defendant:
CH2M-WG, IDAHO LLC
Plaintiff:
United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, Local 648, United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
