Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Logsdon v. United States of America et al
as 5:2019cv00152
Plaintiff:
Martha Joyce Logsdon
Defendant:
United States of America and Hon. William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Hutchins v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Philip L. Hutchins
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Johnson v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00715
Plaintiff:
James B. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Naiser et al v. Unilever United States, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00395
Plaintiff:
Terri Naiser and Jonnie Phillips
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc. , LEK, Inc. and Conopco, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Harris v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00775
Plaintiff:
Frank M Harris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Weaver v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00410
Plaintiff:
Violet Weaver
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00413
Plaintiff:
Harriet Cammile Griffin
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Looper v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00117
Plaintiff:
Maxine Marie Looper
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborn v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00406
Plaintiff:
Doreen S. Osborn
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cross v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
Vicki Ann Cross
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
