Cases 11 - 19 of 19
PAIGE v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISIONS et al
as 1:2014cv01158
Petitioner:
DEMETRIUS L. PAIGE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and CHARLIE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MCCOY v. LAPIN et al
as 1:2011cv02111
Petitioner:
REGINALD L. MCCOY
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPIN, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and ERIC B. HOLDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DRIGGERS v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01781
Plaintiff:
PAUL W. DRIGGERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, MAURENE CRUZ and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELT v. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2010cv01958
Petitioner:
TARIQ L. BELT
Respondent:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, ERIC HOLDER, U.S. DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND BRANCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOWARD v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2009cv00857
Plaintiff:
CLINTON HOWARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RAINEY v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00781
Petitioner:
JOSEPH L. RAINEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARVEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
VANDIVERE v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and HARLEY LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LESLIE v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv00562
Plaintiff:
NEVILLE SYLVESTER LESLIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS and CORNELL COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CONKLIN v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
ERIC K. CONKLIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
