Cases 61 - 70 of 297
In Re: Daniel Miller
as 21-1386
Respondent:
Henry S. Dogin, Administrator Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, United States Department of Justice, David R. Harris, Superintendent, Greenhaven Correctional Facility, Thomas A. Coughlin, III and others
Petitioner:
Daniel Miller
Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inq v. Garland
as 21-1338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Gage, Robert McIlvaine, Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Geoffrey Berman, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States and others
American Oversight v. United States Department of Ju
as 21-1266
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
American Oversight
Onosamba-Ohindo v. Garland
as 21-1044
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, in his official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the Department of Justice, Executive Office For Immigration Review and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as the Acting Administrator of the Buffalo Federal Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez Agustin, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Junior Onosamba-Ohindo, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
P.L. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E
as 21-825
Plaintiff:
J.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R.F.J., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P.L., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, A.Q., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Thomas R. Decker, Director of New York Field Office of ICE, in official capacity, Director Matthew Albence, Director Matthew T. Albence Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement Removal Operations, in official capacity, Daniel J. Daugherty and others
Hong v. United States Securiti
as 21-529
Petitioner:
Victor Hong
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice and United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-319
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
City of Syracuse, NY v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Fi
as 21-191
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffrey A. Rosen, in his offficial capacity as Acting Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
City of Syracuse, NY, City of San Jose, CA, City of Columbia, SC and others
Intervenor:
Zachary Fort, Frederick Barton, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and others
Vazquez Perez v. Decker
as 21-192
Respondent:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General of the United States, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Uriel Vazquez Perez, on his own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated
Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel, LLP v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv09917
Plaintiff:
EMERY CELLI BRINCKERHOFF ABADY WARD & MAAZEL LLP and Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel, LLP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
