Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Su v. Ascent Construction, et al
as 24-4025
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Utah corporation, BRADLEY L. KNOWLTON, an individual, ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, an employee benefit plan and others
Su v. Ascent Construction, et al
as 23-4114
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JULIE A. SU, Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant / Appellant:
ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Utah corporation, BRADLEY L. KNOWLTON and ASCENT CONSTRUCTION, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN, an employee benefit plan
Walsh v. Jessop, et al
as 22-4040
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN JESSOP, an individual
Defendant:
PARAGON CONTRACTORS CORPORATION, JAMES JESSOP, an individual and PAR 2 CONTRACTORS, LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
CITADEL MANAGEMENT, LLC, Receivership Defendant
Receiver:
WAYNE KLEIN and R. WAYNE KLEIN
Perez v. Paragon Contractors, et al
as 17-4025
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
PARAGON CONTRACTORS and BRIAN JESSOP, individually
Defendant:
JAMES JESSOP, individually
Perez v. El Tequila, et al
as 16-5002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
EL TEQUILA, LLC and CARLOS AGUIRRE, individually
Solis v. CSG Workforce Partners, LLC, et al
as 12-4028
Petitioner - Appellee:
HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor for the United States Department of Labor
Respondent - Appellant:
CSG WORKFORCE PARTNERS, LLC, CSG EXTERIORS, LLC, CSG DRYWALL, LLC and others
Department of Labor v. Copart, Inc.
as 10-5148
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Secretary of Labor
Defendant - Appellee:
COPART, INC.
Intervenor - Appellant:
CHARLES L. DALTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.