Cases 11 - 17 of 17
ERIKSEN v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ERIKSEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WELLS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT et al
as 1:2012cv00877
Petitioner:
DAMIEN WELLS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and NANCY SVOBODA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2012cv00601
Petitioner:
RONALD LEE SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv01522
Petitioner:
HERBERT CHAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PRENTICE v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN et al
as 1:2008cv00804
Petitioner:
GLENN PRENTICE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN, BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, NA., GEORGE BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBINSON v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF ALABAMA
as 1:2007cv01237
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MARK ROBINSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF ALABAMA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANDERS v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA et al
as 1:2007cv01132
Petitioner:
GERALD DUANE ANDERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF MONTANA, LIEF B. ERICKSON, ROBERT PALMQUIST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
