Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Colorado Conservation Alliance et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2023cv03294
Plaintiff:
Colorado Conservation Alliance, Christopher Jurney and Michael Clark
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission, Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Defenders of Wildlife, Center for Biological Diversity, Humane Society of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Kansas Natural Resource Coalition et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 6:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Kansas Natural Resource Coalition, Cameron Edwards, Lone Butte Farm, LLC and others
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of Interior, Debra Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Wyoming v. United States Department of Interior Secretary et al
as 2:2023cv00092
Respondent:
United States Department of Interior Secretary, United States Fish and Wildlife Service Director, Deb Haaland and others
Petitioner:
State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 23-1093
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
WildEarth Guardians v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
WildEarth Guardians
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Bureau of Reclamation and Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538 Endangered Species Act
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-8043
Petitioner:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION
Petitioner / Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBRA A. HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, UPPER GREEN RIVER CATTLE ASSOCIATION, SOMMERS RANCH, LLC and others
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Haaland, et al
as 22-8031
Petitioner / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES and YELLOWSTONE TO UINTAS CONNECTION
Petitioner:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and SIERRA CLUB
Respondent / Appellee:
DEBRA A. HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, UPPER GREEN RIVER CATTLE ASSOCIATION, SOMMERS RANCH, LLC and others
Audubon of Kansas v. United States Department of Interior, et al
as 21-3209
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUDUBON OF KANSAS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of United States Department of the Interior and others
Defendant:
BIG BEND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE and KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE/DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES
Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2021cv02992
Petitioner:
Defenders of Wildlife
Respondent:
United States Forest Service and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1531
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv02474
Plaintiff:
Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of the Army, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
