Cases 21 - 30 of 71
WOODWARD v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv01249
Plaintiff:
MARIO DION WOODWARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RILEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01223
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHN RILEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
VITRANO v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2018cv00860
Plaintiff:
THOMAS P. VITRANO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE et al
as 1:2017cv01567
Plaintiff:
JEROME A. BRADLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNKNOWN MEMBERS OF UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CHASE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00274
Plaintiff:
DENNIS CHASE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2016mc02465
Petitioner:
VICTORIA BRYANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
SANCHEZ v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv02395
Petitioner:
FERNANDO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MITCHELL v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
as 1:2016cv01824
Plaintiff:
JAMAL MITCHELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HILLS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01072
Petitioner:
DERRICK HILLS
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH and UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GARZA v. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
as 1:2016cv00976
Plaintiff:
JORGE LUIS GARZA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
