Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Grynberg v. Continental Natural Gas, et al
as 15-8073
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. JACK J. GRYNBERG
Defendant - Appellee: CONTINENTAL NATURAL GAS, INC., CONTINENTAL NATURAL GAS GATHERING, L.L.C. and CONTINENTAL GAS PROCESSING, L.L.C.
Grynberg v. Transwestern Pipeline, et al
as 15-8063
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. JACK J. GRYNBERG
Defendant - Appellee: TRANSWESTERN PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC, ENRON CORPORATION, BLACK MARLIN PIPELINE CO. and others
Defendant: NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE CO. and NORTHERN NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION COMPANY
Grynberg v. Southern Natural Gas Co., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-8058
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. JACK J. GRYNBERG
Defendant - Appellee: SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, SEA ROBIN PIPELINE COMPANY, FLORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY and others
In re: Natural Gas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-8054
: In re: NATURAL GAS ROYALTIES QUI TAM LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. JACK J. GRYNBERG
Defendant - Appellee: PACIFIC INTERSTATE OFFSHORE COMPANY, a California corporation, PACIFIC OFFSHORE PIPELINE COMPANY, a California corporation, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, a California corporation and others
Defendant: ORYX ENERGY COMPANY, PACIFIC GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, n/k/a Gas Transmission Northwest Corporation, NORTHERN BORDER PIPELINE CO. and others
Grynberg v. Coastal States Gas Trans. Co., et al
as 15-8059
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. JACK J. GRYNBERG
Defendant - Appellee: COASTAL STATES GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY, THE COASTAL CORPORATION and others
Thomas, et al v. Black & Veatch Project Corp We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3155
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. KEVIN THOMAS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. CAROLYN THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee: BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP
Troxler v. Warren Clinic, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5144
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. MARK TROXLER
Defendant - Appellee: WARREN CLINIC, INC. and SAINT FRANCIS HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Bishop, et al v. Smith, et al
as 14-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant: GAY E. PHILLIPS and SUSAN G. BARTON
Plaintiff: MARY BISHOP and SHARON BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellee: SALLY HOWE SMITH, in her official capacity as Court Clerk for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America
Defendant-Intervenor: BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, THAD BALKMAN and OKLAHOMAN'S FOR PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE
Bank of Commerce v. Smith, et al
as 14-6013
Plaintiff: BANK OF COMMERCE
Defendant-Cross-Claimant - Appellee: JANET RANKIN SMITH
Defendant Cross Claim Defendant - Appellant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, United States of America, ex rel
Defendant Cross Claim Defendant: CITY OF STILLWATER, Oklahoma, WILLIAM ALLAN SMITH, Trustee of the William Allan Smith Trust dated the 15th day of May, 2008 and OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, State of Oklahoma, ex rel
Bishop, et al v. Smith, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5003
Plaintiff - Appellee: SHARON BALDWIN, MARY BISHOP, GAY E. PHILLIPS, individuals and others
Defendant - Appellant: SALLY HOWE SMITH, in her official capacity as Court Clerk for Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States of America
Defendant-Intervenor: BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, THAD BALKMAN and OKLAHOMAN'S FOR PROTECTION OF MARRIAGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?