Cases 1 - 10 of 41
United States of America ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.
as 23-7468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY BIXLER WOOD
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel Mary Bixler Wood, ALASKA, ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood, CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Mary Bixler Wood and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. and SIEMENS HEALTHCARE DIAGNOSTICS PRODUCTS GMBH
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
United States of America v. McKesson Corporation
as 23-726
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, ex rel, State of California, ex rel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam Hart
Defendant / Appellee:
McKesson Corporation, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, Collectively and McKesson Specialty Care Distrobution Corportaion, Collectively, DBA McKesson Specialty Health
Defendant:
DEF and McKesson Specialty Care Distribution JV LLC, FKA McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Joint Venture LP
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks v. Amgen Inc.
as 23-28
Plaintiff:
State of California ex rel. Don Hanks, State of Delaware ex rel. Don Hanks, District of Columbia ex rel. Don Hanks and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel Don Hanks
Defendant / Appellee:
Florida Cancer Specialists, Gulfcoast Oncology Associates, Integrated Community Oncology Network, LLC and others
Defendant:
Amgen Inc., Montgomery Cancer Center, Oncology Specialties, P.C. and others
United States of America ex. rel. v. Citigroup Inc.
as 22-1615
Plaintiff:
United States of America ex. rel.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tamika Miller, individually
Defendant / Appellee:
Citigroup Inc., Citibank, N.A. and Citibank Inc.
Defendant:
Doe Corporations 1-10
Gibbs v. Bank of America Bank, N.A.
as 22-1344
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Investors, 100 Drug Raped Women and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene M. Gibbs
Defendant / Appellee:
Bank of America Bank, N.A., Nationstar, DBA Mr. Cooper, United States: Freddie Mac and others
United States of America ex re v. Evicore Healthcare MSI, LLC.
as 22-530
Plaintiff:
ABC, State of Tennessee, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America, ex rel. SW CHALLENGER, LLC, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant / Appellee:
Evicore Healthcare MSI, LLC.
Defendant:
DEF and WellCare Health Plans Inc.
United States of America ex re v. Grifols USA, LLC
as 22-107
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America ex rel. Allen Timothy Yu
Defendant / Appellee:
Grifols USA, LLC, Grifols Shared Services North America, Inc., FKA Grifols, Inc., Grifols, S.A and others
Defendant:
DEF, Grifols, Inc. and Grifols Biologicals, Inc.
United States of America, ex r v. Amgen Inc.
as 22-18
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ex Rel. Joseph Piacentile and Kevin B. Kilcoyne, State of California, State of Delaware and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Piacentile and Kevin Kilcoyne
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc., Amerisource Bergen Corp., Amerisource Bergen Specialty Group, Inc. and others
United States of America v. Northern Adult Daily Health Ca
as 21-2155
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ex Rel Orlando Lee, Ex Rel Melville Luckie, Ex Rel Luz Gonzalez, New York State, Ex Rel Orlando Lee, Ex Rel Melville Luckie, Ex Rel Luz Gonzalez and State of New York Office of the Attorney General
Appellant:
Orlando Lee, Melville Luckie and Luz Gonzalez
Defendant / Appellee:
Northern Metropolitan Foundation For Healthcare, Inc., Northern Manor Multicare Center, Inc. and Northern Manor Adult Day Health Care Program
Defendant:
Northern Adult Daily Health Care Center and Galena Deverman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
