Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOVE v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 1:2012cv01046
Plaintiff:
ABDUL LOVE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CHOI v. BOND et al
as 1:2011cv02002
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHOI
Defendant:
BRIAN K. BOND, VALERIE JARRETT, JAMES MESSINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JAMES v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 1:2010cv01675
Plaintiff:
DONVILLE JAMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
HIGGINS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2010cv01485
Plaintiff:
OLIVER J. HIGGINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RUSTON v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2010cv00869
Plaintiff:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
JONES v. KARPINSKI et al
as 1:2010cv00560
Plaintiff:
JASON EARL JONES
Defendant:
WALT KARPINSKI, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILL v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2010cv00020
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GILL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JUDICAL WATCH, INC., v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
as 1:2009cv02312
Plaintiff:
JUDICAL WATCH, INC., and JUDICAL WATCH, INC.,
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
