Cases 1 - 10 of 46
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Galloway-Bell Inc. v. Crowder Industrial Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Galloway-Bell Inc.
Defendant:
Crowder Industrial Construction, LLC, Alberici-Mortenson, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc. et al v. Poettker Construction Company et al
as 4:2023cv00217
Counter Defendant:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blankenship Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Poettker Construction Company, Zodiac-Poettker HBZ Joint Venture II, LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Sand Point Services, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of QUALITY GLASS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
Sand Point Services, LLC, Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Prolift Rigging Company, LLC v. Crane Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Prolift Rigging Company, LLC
Defendant:
Crane Technologies Group, Inc. and NGM Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Colby Enterprises, Inc. v. TDX Quality, LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Colby Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
TDX Quality, LLC and Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of ERICKSON ASSOCIATES, INC. v. Windamir Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of ERICKSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
Windamir Development, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc. et al v. Windamir Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc. and Blankenship Group, Inc. doing business as Blankenship Civil Construction
Defendant:
Windamir Development, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the Use and Benefit of Southern Equipment & Services, LLC et al v. Windamir Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Southern Equipment & Services, LLC
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the Use and Benefit of Southern Equipment & Services, LLC
Defendant:
Windamir Development, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
BONITZ INC v. LEEBCOR SERVICES LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
BONITZ INC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE OF doing business as BONITZ FLOORING GROUP INC and BONITZ INC United State of America, for the use and benefit of doing business as BONITZ FLOORING GROUP INC
Defendant:
LEEBCOR SERVICES LLC and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of The Dewitt-Tilton Group, Inc. and The Dewitt-Tilton Group, Inc. v. Windamir Development, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00240
Counter Defendant:
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of The Dewitt-Tilton Group, Inc. and The Dewitt-Tilton Group, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Windamir Development, Inc. and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
