Cases filed in Texas
Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Nails and Staples, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America et al
as 6:2024cv00255
Plaintiff: Nails and Staples, Inc. The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Nails and Staples, Inc. doing business as Express Interiors
Defendant: Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America and Direct Steel, LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of RSM Builders Supply Inc v. The Ross Group Construction Corporation, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00174
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of R.S.M. Builders Supply, Inc. and United States of America for the Use and Benefit of RSM Builders Supply Inc
Defendant: The Ross Group Construction Corporation, LLC and Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Sam Chapa Electrical Contractors, LLC v. Mission Support Services, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00250
Plaintiff: the United States of America for the use and benefit of Sam Chapa Electrical Contractors, LLC
Defendant: Mission Support Services, LLC, Federal Insurance Company, Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and Benefit of Service Steel Warehouse Co LP v. Washington International Insurance Co et al
as 1:2023cv00126
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Service Steel Warehouse Co LP
Defendant: Washington International Insurance Co, Federal Constructors, Inc and Metroplex Fabrication & Erection, LLP
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of MMM Plumbing, Heating, and Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Sames, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00069
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of MMM Plumbing, Heating, and Air Conditioning, Inc.
Defendant: Sames, Inc. and Lexon Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
United States of America v. Pacific Indemnity Company et al
as 7:2022cv00109
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit ofDiversified Interiors of Amarillo, LTD and The United States of America
Defendant: Pacific Indemnity Company, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Smith v. C3, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00907
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Anna Smith doing business as Brazos Valley Tile Installations and Anna Smith United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Anna Smith doing business as Brazos Valley Tile Installations
Defendant: C3, LLC doing business as Cueto Consulting and Construction, LLC, Andrew Cueto and Lexon Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Extraco Technology, LLC v. Sames, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00157
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Extraco Technology, LLC
Defendant: Sames, Inc., Lexon Insurance Company, Emergy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
A.H. Beck Foundation Co., Inc. v. Westfield Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00071
Defendant: Westfield Insurance Company
Claimant: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of A.H. Beck Foundation Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: A.H. Beck Foundation Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
Horizone Construction I, Ltd v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2021cv00201
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Horizone Construction I, Ltd and Horizone Construction I, Ltd.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Carothers Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?