Cases 1 - 10 of 31
CLASS v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
JAVIER CLASS
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
HENDERSON v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
DAVID HENDERSON
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
FLANAGAN v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2022cv04260
Plaintiff:
STEVEN FLANAGAN
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
WARD v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv02678
Plaintiff:
PATRICE WARD
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
SMITH v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv02205
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
SUBBA v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
AMAR SUBBA
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
FALASCA v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv00606
Plaintiff:
Ms. RENEE FALASCA and RENEE FALASCA
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FRANK v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv04997
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FRANK
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
LANG v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2021cv03955
Plaintiff:
BRENDA LANG
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
MOORE v. UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv02401
Defendant:
UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
