Cases 41 - 50 of 648
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Nefris Yanire Bran et al
as 2:2022cv08529
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Nefris Yanire Bran individually doing business as Donde Angie Ecuadorian Food and Mariscos Los Guasavenos an unknown business entity doing business as Donde Angie Ecuadorian Food
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Hector Leonel Alvarado et al
as 2:2022cv08410
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Hector Leonel Alvarado, Edwin Uriel Alvarado, Honduran Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Olga Lidia Cordon Ponce et al
as 2:2022cv08390
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Olga Lidia Cordon Ponce, Gesell Ponce Morales, Dona Bibis Restaurant, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Aidas Mattis et al
as 2:2022cv08090
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Aidas Joseph Mattis, Edita Lipas Mattis, Douglas Martin Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Carla Pamela Pastor et al
as 2:2022cv07991
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Carla Pamela Pastor individually doing business as Casa Ruiz Peruvian Restaurant and Casa Ruiz Peruvian Restaurant, LLC an unknown business entity doing business as Casa Ruiz Peruvian Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Malkit Sogy et al
as 2:2022cv08003
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Malkit Sogy individually doing business as Bollywood Bar, Grill and Pizza, Sogy and Sons, Inc. doing business as Bollywood Bar, Grill and Pizza and Sogy and Sons, Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as Bollywood Bar, Grill and Pizza
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Snyder et al
as 3:2022cv01702
Defendant:
Elite Venues L.L.C. an unknown business entity doing business as Salt Drift Pointe formerly known as Beast Mode Events L.L.C., Terrence R. Snyder individually and doing business as Salt Drift Pointe, Richard M. Inzunza individually and doing business as Salt Drift Pointe and others
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Sergio Franco et al
as 2:2022cv07920
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC and G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Sergio Franco, Jesus Franco, Klownski Foundation Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Alfredo Garcia Ramirez et al
as 2:2022cv07804
Plaintiff:
G and G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Alfredo Garcia Ramirez individually doing business as El Bar De Siempre Inc. and El Bar De Siempre Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as El Bar De Siempre Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521 Violations of Cable Communications Act of 1984
Brandon Michael Mann v. Eric J. Holcomb et al
as 2:2022cv07726
Petitioner:
Brandon Michael Mann
Respondent:
Eric J. Holcomb, Bob Grennes, Tammy Tschetter and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
